The Tegal Radyo and the Bisa Mendapatkan

togel hongkong

The Tegal Radyo and the Bisa Mendapatkan

To Gel Hongkong is a fictional character written by its Chinese author Fulder Kaifeng. This is the story of how a commoner girl named Wenying entered into a marriage with a rich man named Lung Feng, who owned a powerful metal factory. In order to please his wife, he offered to pay her allowance every month and give her a small car. She accepted the offer, not knowing that the factory owner had secretly been stashing huge sums of money in his bank for years.

One day, while traveling back to her home in Tokelau, she realized that her old car had been refitted with new tires. When she went to the team and reported to her employer that the car no longer had its original tires, he became suspicious. As the woman never went out herself, he suspected that she had someone else’s license and used this to question her about the whole matter. When she denied any knowledge of it, Fulder Kaifeng took the case to the Tokelau district court, accusing her of fraud, since she used her own car without purchasing the service beforehand.

The court found her not guilty and dismissed her complaint about being deceived, but it was too late. The owner of the factory where Wenying lived had already taken measures to flee to Australia. Fulder appealed to the Telah and the High Court, which ordered him to present his case before a jury. He presented his version of events, starting from when he received the car request to the days following the request, until the present day. The trial lasted for one month and resulted in the jury delivering its verdict on August first.

The judge explained that he had to award the togel hongkong prize to Fulder because there were more than a few similarities between the stories of each of the women. He added that there were several salient features between the two stories. One example was the amount of money that Fulder had given to Wenying. Wenying had never been given an amount by anyone outside her family before. Fulder had never given anyone money before and this was part of what differentiated the two cases. The judge then added that Fulder’s evidence also showed that he was not the only person to offer gifts to Wenying.

In addition, the judge noted that the set of circumstances in which the presents were exchanged suggested that the motive behind the act was not only to obtain something but also to test the women’s loyalty. Another aspect that Fulder had to prove with the help of testimonies in court were that the bisa mendapatkan and rosary were not given to Wenying by Fulder during the period of their marriage. Instead, the women gave them to other people including the former guardian of their brother Pasil.

The judge then noted that Fulder had given two gifts to Pasil during their marriage but only one of them had been a gift from Fulder to Wenying, meaning that the other gift came from somewhere else. The former guardian of Pasil had testified that the woman told him that she had received the terpercaya from Fulder and that he had given her a brown paper bag. The prosecution claimed that the whole scenario was contrived by the defense to convince the jury that Fulder had only given a bag of rice to Wenying.